ÌìÃÀ´«Ã½

BACKGROUND

Emissions and their impact on the environment are a major focus for companies and operators in the Oil and Gas Industry. Methane emissions from flaring are particularly concerning, as methane is 26 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Previous studies suggested a flare destruction efficiency between 98-99%, but new technologies and methods have brought this into question. ÌìÃÀ´«Ã½ Digital Engineering developed a methodology using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to predict the methane destruction efficiency of an operational flare. Our client sought to determine the efficiency of their flare under various conditions to identify opportunities for improvement.

THE CHALLENGE

Our client needed to understand the operational methane destruction efficiency of their flare under a range of conditions. This required a detailed analysis of how different factors, such as crosswind speeds and the positioning of ignition sources, impact the efficiency. The primary objective was to identify areas for improvement to minimize methane emissions and meet environmental regulations.

THE SOLUTION

ÌìÃÀ´«Ã½ Digital Engineering created a comprehensive CFD model of the client's flare system. This model included:

• A 3D representation of the flare geometry, including flare tips, ignition sources, wind fences, and platforms.
• Wind speed calculations at the flare tip using an atmospheric boundary layer profile.
• Transient calculations of species transport with a complex chemistry combustion model to predict flare performance accurately.
• Extensive monitoring of combustion reactants and products to ensure precise and reliable destruction efficiency measurements.

The model evaluated the flare under normal, startup, and extreme operating conditions. Sensitivity studies helped determine the combustion reaction temperatures necessary to ensure accurate destruction efficiency reporting.

THE RESULT

The analysis revealed a wide range of destruction efficiencies, from 52% to 95%, depending on the operating conditions. It highlighted the sensitivity of flare efficiency to crosswind conditions and the positioning of ignition sources. For example, at mean operating conditions with a 20th percentile crosswind speed, the methane exit velocity was significantly lower than the crosswind speed, causing considerable methane dispersion and reduced combustion efficiency.

Visualizations of the combustion profile under different crosswind velocities provided insights into the mechanisms impacting destruction efficiency. The study also identified a design improvement opportunity for the flare tip, suggesting adding a dedicated pilot for the low-pressure (LP) flare to enhance overall efficiency.

The findings enabled our client to develop plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve flare efficiency. This case study demonstrated that destruction efficiency varies widely across different conditions, often falling below the previously assumed 98-99%.

Ready to optimize your flare destruction efficiency? Contact our expert team today.